With a new baseball season underway I thought I’d check in on the 30 MLB teams on Twitter and Facebook. Which teams are seeing the most growth?
I have not done a sports team comparison post in quite a while, mainly because the figures quickly become outdated and total reach is not all that important to look at.
But one advantage of having done this in the past is that I have previous figures to compare against.
Since it has been two years since I did The Most Popular MLB Teams on Twitter and Facebook I thought it would be interesting to revisit this and capture the growth rate for all the teams.
MLB Teams on Twitter
First the teams’ official Twitter profiles.
Here are the 30 baseball clubs ranked by two-year growth rate:
Twitter followers 4/10/12 | Twitter followers 4/5/10 | Two-Year Growth Rate |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Milwaukee Brewers | 66,756 | 1,653 | 3938% |
2 | Chicago White Sox | 53,642 | 1,524 | 3420% |
3 | St. Louis Cardinals | 124,175 | 3,976 | 3023% |
4 | Colorado Rockies | 36,431 | 1,237 | 2845% |
5 | Chicago Cubs | 110,648 | 4,595 | 2308% |
6 | Toronto Blue Jays | 110,659 | 4,775 | 2217% |
7 | Boston Red Sox | 230,621 | 10,127 | 2177% |
8 | Houston Astros | 29,255 | 1,336 | 2090% |
9 | Texas Rangers | 132,593 | 6,149 | 2056% |
10 | Cleveland Indians | 50,408 | 2,360 | 2036% |
11 | Miami Marlins | 35,520 | 1,824 | 1847% |
12 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 39,543 | 2,636 | 1400% |
13 | Washington Nationals | 31,467 | 2,165 | 1353% |
14 | San Francisco Giants | 239,976 | 16,742 | 1333% |
15 | New York Mets | 82,694 | 6,916 | 1096% |
16 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 34,104 | 2,885 | 1082% |
17 | Tampa Bay Rays | 51,987 | 4,677 | 1012% |
18 | Baltimore Orioles | 40,014 | 3,657 | 994% |
19 | Atlanta Braves | 147,060 | 14,626 | 905% |
20 | Los Angeles Angels | 46,512 | 4,701 | 889% |
21 | Minnesota Twins | 71,632 | 8,046 | 790% |
22 | San Diego Padres | 34,063 | 3,996 | 752% |
23 | Detroit Tigers | 88,899 | 11,493 | 674% |
24 | Cincinnati Reds | 81,064 | 10,910 | 643% |
25 | Seattle Mariners | 45,832 | 6,669 | 587% |
26 | Kansas City Royals | 47,516 | 7,361 | 546% |
27 | Oakland Athletics | 40,928 | 6,365 | 543% |
28 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 104,760 | 18,371 | 470% |
29 | New York Yankees | 563,459 | 272,665 | 107% |
30 | Philadelphia Phillies | 682,373 | 561,223 | 22% |
Not surprisingly the baseball teams with massive growth rates are the ones that were just getting started a couple of years ago. But nice to see those clubs connecting with more fans.
I did not expect to see the Phillies at the bottom of the list but with all the success they’ve had in the past five years or so helped them build up a large following early on.
Plus the Phillies and Yankees were on Twitter’s old Suggested Users list which gave them a big advantage at the time.
Here are the teams ranked by current total followers:
Twitter followers 4/10/12 | Twitter followers 4/5/10 | Two-Year Growth Rate |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Philadelphia Phillies | 682,373 | 561,223 | 22% |
2 | New York Yankees | 563,459 | 272,665 | 107% |
3 | San Francisco Giants | 239,976 | 16,742 | 1333% |
4 | Boston Red Sox | 230,621 | 10,127 | 2177% |
5 | Atlanta Braves | 147,060 | 14,626 | 905% |
6 | Texas Rangers | 132,593 | 6,149 | 2056% |
7 | St. Louis Cardinals | 124,175 | 3,976 | 3023% |
8 | Toronto Blue Jays | 110,659 | 4,775 | 2217% |
9 | Chicago Cubs | 110,648 | 4,595 | 2308% |
10 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 104,760 | 18,371 | 470% |
11 | Detroit Tigers | 88,899 | 11,493 | 674% |
12 | New York Mets | 82,694 | 6,916 | 1096% |
13 | Cincinnati Reds | 81,064 | 10,910 | 643% |
14 | Minnesota Twins | 71,632 | 8,046 | 790% |
15 | Milwaukee Brewers | 66,756 | 1,653 | 3938% |
16 | Chicago White Sox | 53,642 | 1,524 | 3420% |
17 | Tampa Bay Rays | 51,987 | 4,677 | 1012% |
18 | Cleveland Indians | 50,408 | 2,360 | 2036% |
19 | Kansas City Royals | 47,516 | 7,361 | 546% |
20 | Los Angeles Angels | 46,512 | 4,701 | 889% |
21 | Seattle Mariners | 45,832 | 6,669 | 587% |
22 | Oakland Athletics | 40,928 | 6,365 | 543% |
23 | Baltimore Orioles | 40,014 | 3,657 | 994% |
24 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 39,543 | 2,636 | 1400% |
25 | Colorado Rockies | 36,431 | 1,237 | 2845% |
26 | Miami Marlins | 35,520 | 1,824 | 1847% |
27 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 34,104 | 2,885 | 1082% |
28 | San Diego Padres | 34,063 | 3,996 | 752% |
29 | Washington Nationals | 31,467 | 2,165 | 1353% |
30 | Houston Astros | 29,255 | 1,336 | 2090% |
I thought the Yankees and Red Sox would be at the top but nice job by the Phillies to be #1 despite the poorest two-year growth rate.
We’ll see if all the attention the new look, new stadium Miami Marlins are getting (both positive and negative) will start pushing their Twitter numbers up.
Right now approximately 30K followers is the bottom of the range. That is still fairly low (hey teams near the bottom, do some more promotion!) but up considerably from the low end of 1.5K two years ago.
MLB Teams on Facebook
Now a look at the official Facebook pages.
First the two-year growth rates:
Facebook likes 4/10/12 | Facebook likes 4/5/10 | Two-Year Growth Rate |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Texas Rangers | 1,223,799 | 118,638 | 932% |
2 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 964,330 | 171,098 | 464% |
3 | Cincinnati Reds | 525,261 | 98,632 | 433% |
4 | San Diego Padres | 366,680 | 77,636 | 372% |
5 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 315,023 | 68,085 | 363% |
T-6 | Atlanta Braves | 1,095,495 | 242,171 | 352% |
T-6 | Los Angeles Angels | 447,185 | 98,922 | 352% |
8 | New York Yankees | 5,359,534 | 1,249,555 | 329% |
9 | San Francisco Giants | 1,373,552 | 321,164 | 328% |
10 | Toronto Blue Jays | 406,837 | 98,513 | 313% |
11 | Colorado Rockies | 446,302 | 109,960 | 306% |
12 | St. Louis Cardinals | 1,227,815 | 305,230 | 302% |
13 | Detroit Tigers | 963,627 | 248,167 | 288% |
14 | Tampa Bay Rays | 406,644 | 107,636 | 278% |
T-15 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 237,985 | 63,118 | 277% |
T-15 | Chicago White Sox | 854,104 | 226,825 | 277% |
17 | Baltimore Orioles | 346,308 | 92,042 | 276% |
18 | Seattle Mariners | 476,187 | 135,240 | 252% |
19 | Philadelphia Phillies | 1,179,318 | 337,405 | 250% |
20 | Cleveland Indians | 505,293 | 147,130 | 243% |
21 | Milwaukee Brewers | 565,989 | 169,004 | 235% |
22 | Boston Red Sox | 3,502,176 | 1,052,128 | 233% |
23 | Washington Nationals | 138,707 | 42,411 | 227% |
24 | Houston Astros | 404,990 | 125,677 | 222% |
25 | New York Mets | 551,335 | 181,531 | 204% |
26 | Miami Marlins | 244,331 | 81,382 | 200% |
27 | Chicago Cubs | 1,583,999 | 537,492 | 195% |
28 | Minnesota Twins | 742,815 | 272,034 | 173% |
29 | Kansas City Royals | 281,070 | 112,616 | 150% |
30 | Oakland Athletics | 305,993 | 189,187 | 62% |
The Rangers have nearly twice the growth rate of any team which is not surprising considering they were in the World Series the last two seasons.
The Dodgers have also seen a lot of growth. This might partly be a large market getting more active or perhaps all the attention around the team sale has sparked more fan interest.
Overall the Facebook growth percentages are considerably smaller than Twitter but the teams have attracted much larger fan bases on Facebook. In many cases the 2010 Facebook numbers are still larger than the 2012 Twitter numbers.
Now the MLB team pages ranked by total likes:
Facebook likes 4/10/12 | Facebook likes 4/5/10 | Two-Year Growth Rate |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York Yankees | 5,359,534 | 1,249,555 | 329% |
2 | Boston Red Sox | 3,502,176 | 1,052,128 | 233% |
3 | Chicago Cubs | 1,583,999 | 537,492 | 195% |
4 | San Francisco Giants | 1,373,552 | 321,164 | 328% |
5 | St. Louis Cardinals | 1,227,815 | 305,230 | 302% |
6 | Texas Rangers | 1,223,799 | 118,638 | 932% |
7 | Philadelphia Phillies | 1,179,318 | 337,405 | 250% |
8 | Atlanta Braves | 1,095,495 | 242,171 | 352% |
9 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 964,330 | 171,098 | 464% |
10 | Detroit Tigers | 963,627 | 248,167 | 288% |
11 | Chicago White Sox | 854,104 | 226,825 | 277% |
12 | Minnesota Twins | 742,815 | 272,034 | 173% |
13 | Milwaukee Brewers | 565,989 | 169,004 | 235% |
14 | New York Mets | 551,335 | 181,531 | 204% |
15 | Cincinnati Reds | 525,261 | 98,632 | 433% |
16 | Cleveland Indians | 505,293 | 147,130 | 243% |
17 | Seattle Mariners | 476,187 | 135,240 | 252% |
18 | Los Angeles Angels | 447,185 | 98,922 | 352% |
19 | Colorado Rockies | 446,302 | 109,960 | 306% |
20 | Toronto Blue Jays | 406,837 | 98,513 | 313% |
21 | Tampa Bay Rays | 406,644 | 107,636 | 278% |
22 | Houston Astros | 404,990 | 125,677 | 222% |
23 | San Diego Padres | 366,680 | 77,636 | 372% |
24 | Baltimore Orioles | 346,308 | 92,042 | 276% |
25 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 315,023 | 68,085 | 363% |
26 | Oakland Athletics | 305,993 | 189,187 | 62% |
27 | Kansas City Royals | 281,070 | 112,616 | 150% |
28 | Miami Marlins | 244,331 | 81,382 | 200% |
29 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 237,985 | 63,118 | 277% |
30 | Washington Nationals | 138,707 | 42,411 | 227% |
Here the Yankees and Red Sox take their expected positions and the Yankees are #1 by a large margin.
The Phillies are still top 10 but they are more in the pack on Facebook (again a testament to the power of the Twitter Suggested Users list).
The Nationals’ last place position on Facebook and #29 ranking on Twitter gives them the smallest combined following.
Quy Le says
I think you mistyped the Facebook likes for the Colorado Rockies. Instead of “464,302” it should be “446,302”
http://fanpagelist.com/user/rockies
Adam Sherk says
Thanks Quy, looks like I inverted the 4 and the 6. I’ve updated both Facebook tables. The Rockies’ Facebook growth rate is now 306% instead of 322%, which drops them down one place. It also moves them down one place in the total likes table.
Ryan Hoody says
Thank you for the post Adam. As someone who played University baseball in the States, I can appreciate any post that touches on the game. It is interesting to see MLB jump on the technology spotlight as well. I am not surprised by the top four, seeing as they have had the most success, and the most media coverage over the last few years. Any conclusions on what Twitter coverage is doing for ticket sales or season ticket sales?
Loved the post,
Ryan
Adam Sherk says
Thanks Ryan, I’m glad you liked it. Great question about ticket and season ticket sales. I haven’t seen any data on that, but if I do I’ll let you know.